🔗 Share this article

Itranspired he could survive losing against Grimsby. Survive a decisive continental showpiece against a particularly poor Spurs sides in living memory. He could survive losing at home to West Ham and Wolves, a lowly league position, an unwavering system, laying waste to some of the club’s most promising academy products, a poor winning percentage, labeling the squad the worst in Manchester United history. Yet, there existed one adversary with whom Ruben Amorim was not permitted to tango. If you challenge the sporting director, you had better succeed.

Regrettably, like many a top-flight right-back during Blackburn Rovers' title-winning 1994-95 season, Amorim came at the executive and appears to have failed. The most distracted of readers can see the irony here: a manager who often railed his squad for losing individual battles crumbling when confronted by the white heat and animal charisma of a the Premier League’s most intimidating sporting directors.

And frankly, this whole painful saga appears to portray the director in a different perspective. Perhaps it might have been easy, given his brief stint in a similar role at Southampton, to regard Jason Wilcox as little more than a functionary in the United exoskeleton: an individual whose appointment was due as much to his close relationship with his former boss a fellow executive rather than any verifiable talent. How mistaken everyone was. In brilliantly outmanoeuvring United’s feted head coach, as he outmanoeuvred the unfortunate Dan Ashworth before him, he has proved himself as one of the sport’s true generals: a tactical intellect that the club's competitors are now justifiably concerned.

The Strategic Clash Over Formation and Philosophy

For example, it was Jason Wilcox , after being involved in the hierarchy that appointed the rigid 3-4-3 advocate Amorim originally, was instrumental in trying to persuade Amorim to ditch his beloved 3-4-3. Naturally, these entreaties met a certain resistance. But perhaps these judgements carry more weight when issued from the mouth of a man the unimpeachable soccer background he possesses, a veteran of international appearances and a contributor to a title-winning side from 31 years ago.

Perhaps in time Jason Wilcox might agree to outline his reasoning publicly. Maybe one day questions may arise why Amorim is walking away with full compensation, without any compensation reduction clause activated. The director seldom speaks publicly, for excellent reasons. The real thinkers of this sport – individuals such as Jason Wilcox – simply operate at a level beyond our own mundane comprehension. If he ever did speak, most likely all we would hear would be ultrasonic blips and complex calculations. Desiring an explanation is not the same as being ready to comprehend it.

An Ultimate Power Behind Command

Naturally, by focusing our attention on Jason Wilcox we are obscuring the true genius behind the modern United throne. Jason Wilcox is, after all, simply carrying out the directives of his line manager Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who privately has made very clear his preference for a back four. It is reported, the owner has also proposed deploying the forward as a right wing-back. The owner is eager for United to adopt data science and analytics. According to ESPN, during a leadership summit early in his investment, he declared that United’s style to football “will be decided by this group”.

Ultimately, Ratcliffe is an expert in this technical footballing stuff, leveraging his background in industry and sailing. Most importantly he remains immensely wealthy, and it is known, the rich are the best of us: more insightful, more wise, strategically brilliant, simply better. Who else could one trust to manage a strategic plan of cost-cutting, the construction of a modern arena that looks a lot like an abstract design, the signing of a new striker?

The Modern Football Order: Directors Over Coaches

This is a trend we are increasingly seeing at the elite levels of the game. For decades, clubs foolishly entrusted big footballing decisions to low-level employees such as coaches, talent spotters – even footballers. Perhaps it was once possible for an up-and-coming, innovative manager with a philosophy and energy to join a club and see their vision supported to fruition. But how many companies have such individuals established? What number of mass redundancies have they overseen? Better by far to place the real power where it rightly belongs: the executive class, the casually dressed executives, the guys with the jaw-dropping LinkedIn profiles. It is wiser to decide the strategy by the directors and hire a coach who can tailor their methods accordingly. If managers were once chefs, they have become more akin to Deliveroo drivers: not creating the product, but still ultimately answerable should it be delivered poorly or fails of the box.

In the meantime, their job has become not about defining the vision and more about selling it: the front-facing representative on the front desk, the public face of an organisation they can do little to change. Enzo Maresca leads a team of literal children into the Champions League and wins two medium-sized trophies, and essentially is dismissed for talking. A manager at Celtic finds his standing damaged while the people who appointed him continue to make errors indefinitely.

A Modern Corporate Football: Accountability Only for the Coaches

And possibly in a small way this represents corporate governance in action: the rise of a gilded elite who can never be wrong, whose choices remain untouchable, whose errors can always be sacked away without justification. Appoint the 3-4-3 coach and then fire them for using excessively that system. Hire the project manager and later bin them for requiring too long. And most importantly be grateful; for your modest increases in ticket costs, for the latest player acquisitions, for the reality that the adults – regardless of their expertise – are in charge.