🔗 Share this article

Russia's monetary authority has announced it is seeking damages valued at $230 billion from the financial institution Euroclear. This legal step represents a clear response from the Kremlin regarding plans to utilize frozen Russian state funds to aid Ukraine.

The Legal Claim

According to reports in local news outlets, the central bank filed a claim last week for approximately 18 trillion roubles. This sum is equivalent to the aforementioned $230 billion claim.

European Union officials will decide later this week regarding a proposal to use approximately €210 billion in frozen Russian assets. This scheme involves granting Ukraine with a large loan to finance its military and economic stability.

The vast majority of these funds, totaling €185 billion, are stored at the Euroclear depository in Brussels. Euroclear acts as the main keeper for the Russian immobilised sovereign wealth.

Dispute on Ownership

EU authorities have argued that their proposal is on solid legal ground. Their position rests on the principle that title of the sovereign wealth remains with Russia, even though it was immobilized in European countries shortly after the full-scale military offensive of Ukraine.

Moscow, in contrast, has called any use of the assets as illegal appropriation. It has warned of retaliatory measures, including confiscating European corporate holdings within Russia.

The head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, a figure who has taken on a prominent position in diplomatic talks, wrote on a social media platform that Russia "will win in court" and retrieve its assets. He added that the European Union, the common currency, and Euroclear "will face consequences" from the plan.

Geopolitical Maneuvering

With statements seen as an effort to drive a wedge between Europe and the United States, the official described the proposal as "a severe attack on property rights and the global financial system established by the United States."

The clearing house declined to provide a statement on the latest lawsuit. The institution has in the past stated it is contending with more than 100 lawsuits in Russian courts.

Enforcement Challenges

While courts in EU countries are unlikely to enforce judgments from Russian tribunals, analysts anticipate Moscow to pursue enforcement in countries with closer ties to the Kremlin.

"Russian monetary authorities may attempt to implement a Russian legal ruling against Euroclear in countries such as China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other friendly nations, provided that relevant holdings can be identified," stated a legal expert from an NSP law firm.

EU Countermeasures

European authorities said they are working on measures to discourage other nations from assisting any Russian legal action against European companies. They are also designing protections to protect EU countries with assets in Russia from what they call "illegal expropriation."

The Proposed Loan Mechanism

According to the detailed scheme, the EU would issue an initial €90 billion loan to Ukraine, backed by the proceeds earned from the immobilized assets at Euroclear. Importantly, Russia's ownership claim on the principal funds would remain untouched.

Kyiv would only be required to repay the money in the event that Russia consented to pay compensation for the vast destruction caused during the nearly four-year conflict.

Alternative Proposals

Belgium, supported by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has urged the EU to consider an alternative approach for funding Ukraine. This entails common EU borrowing to secure a loan, using unused funds within the EU budget.

This alternative move, however, requires full agreement among all 27 member states. The Hungarian government, considered aligned with the Kremlin, has previously signaled its objection.

Commenting on Monday, the EU top diplomat, a senior official, said the reparations loan as "the strongest solution" for supporting Ukraine. "This mechanism is secured against the Russian immobilized funds, meaning it is not drawn from our taxpayers' money, which is equally important," she remarked. "It also delivers a powerful signal that if you cause all this damage to another nation, you have to pay for the rebuilding."